246 / 2018-05-08 23:18:18
Preconditioning Hole Burden Evaluation for Deep Level Stopes
preconditioning,ground penetrating radar (GPR)
摘要录用
ZWELINZIMA THEBETHE / UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND
EVERT KLEYNHANS / ANGLOGOLDASHANTI (MPONENG GOLD MINE)
Deep level gold mine panel stopes have an inherent risk of face bursts, due to the high face stress conditions encountered. As a face burst control measure, face perpendicular preconditioning of stope faces has been successfully implemented over the last 15 years throughout the industry.

The application of preconditioning is based on the SIMRAC issued ‘Precondition Implementation Guidelines’, which are based on the research work documented under projects GAP 030, GAP 336 and GAP 811. The guidelines recommended a hole burden spacing of 3.0m and a hole length of 3.0m as the initial values for the preconditioning standard.

The preconditioning guidelines further indicated that, the monitoring of the effectiveness of preconditioning should be conducted at implementation sites when conditions differ markedly from those investigated during the development of the technique. The initial investigations during GAP 030 and 336 projects were conducted at sites with a maximum depth of 2400m. Current mining panels have become deeper to depths of up to 3400m. It therefore became important to monitor the effectiveness of preconditioning at current mining depths, and to change some of the parameters in the standard to suit conditions were found necessary. Amendable face-perpendicular preconditioning parameters include: hole length and hole burden spacing.

During the initial preconditioning technique development project, one of the successful assessment tool used was GPR profiling. The tool can be applied to determine the effectiveness of preconditioning by determining the extent and intensity of fracturing ahead of the panel face. The project therefore used GPR profiling for the assessment of blasted preconditioned panels.

Following GPR profiling of 10 preconditioned sites, and analyses of the results obtained, the following conclusions were made:

 The depth of fracturing ahead of a preconditioned deep level panel is not determined by the precon hole length, but is influenced by face stress values.
 A minimum precon hole length of 2.4m has been shown to be adequate in achieving an adequate fracture depth for effective preconditioning, therefore the preconditioning guideline must be amended to indicate the minimum hole length as 2.4m for use by the industry, as opposed to the 3.0m indicated.
 The precon hole burden spacing of 3.0m as given by the guideline is confirmed as the effective spacing for achieving a continuous fracture profile ahead of the faces.
 Where efficient burden spacing is encountered, the depth of fracturing is increased, and inversely the areas where over spacing is encountered the depth of fracturing is reduced.
 The increase in fracture depth when hole burden spacing is reduced is insignificant at a range of 6cm increase for 0.5m burden reduction. Burden spacing reduction does not significantly increase fracture depth, however it can be used to ensure 100% probability of continuous fracture achievement.
 The precon guideline should indicate a burden spacing of minimum 2.5m and maximum 3.0m.
重要日期
  • 会议日期

    10月22日

    2018

    10月24日

    2018

  • 05月31日 2018

    摘要截稿日期

  • 07月05日 2018

    初稿截稿日期

  • 08月10日 2018

    初稿录用通知日期

  • 10月24日 2018

    注册截止日期

主办单位
北京科技大学
McGill University
中国矿业大学(北京)
河南理工大学
University of Wollongong
东北大学
重庆大学
中国矿业大学
Laurentian University
辽宁工程技术大学
西安科技大学
北方工业大学
江西理工大学
黑龙江科技大学
协办单位
中国职业安全健康协会
中国安全生产科学研究院
煤炭信息研究院
中安安全工程研究院
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Safety Science
移动端
在手机上打开
小程序
打开微信小程序
客服
扫码或点此咨询