339 / 2020-02-02 19:36:51
A contrastive analysis of English academic and non-academic texts within the framework of transitivity theory
transitivity theory,academic text,contrastive study
摘要录用
Lianzhu Wang / Xinxiang Medical University; Beijing Foreign Studies University
 Based on Halliday’s transitivity theory (Halliday 1967a, 1967b, 1968, 1985, 1994; Halliday & Matthiessen 2004, 2014), this study constructed a new transitivity system for discourse analysis, and this new system has been used to analyze texts of different genre, including academic and non-academic texts. After analyzing process types of the English academic and non-academic (eg. news texts) texts both quantitatively and qualitatively, this study finds: 1) in academic texts, relational process, mental process and action process cover 47%, 29% and 24% respectively while in news texts, action process, relational process and mental process cover 46%, 30% and 24% respectively; 2) for academic texts, relational process shares nearly half (47%) of all processes while for news texts, action process shares nearly half (46%); 3) further study shows that the same is approximately true of Chinese academic and non-academic texts. These findings reveal that the duty of scientific research is to explore the attribute and state of entity, and the correlation of entities, while the major task of news media is to offer a reportage of events such as goings-on and happenings. Contrastive analysis of texts of different genres with the aid of transitivity system can help learners and writers better understand the characteristics of academic and non-academic texts.

 
重要日期
  • 会议日期

    10月16日

    2020

    10月18日

    2020

  • 09月05日 2020

    报告提交截止日期

  • 10月08日 2020

    摘要截稿日期

  • 10月08日 2020

    摘要录用通知日期

  • 10月14日 2020

    初稿截稿日期

  • 10月14日 2020

    初稿录用通知日期

  • 10月18日 2020

    注册截止日期

主办单位
中国英汉语比较研究会英语教学研究分会
承办单位
北京师范大学
联系方式
历届会议
移动端
在手机上打开
小程序
打开微信小程序
客服
扫码或点此咨询